Calculus XOR Probability - sci.math

Message from discussion Calculus XOR Probability

David C. Ullrich

View profile

More options Apr 14 2006, 12:42 pm

Newsgroups: sci.math

From: David C. Ullrich <ullr...@math.okstate.edu>

Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 05:42:26 -0500

Local: Fri, Apr 14 2006 12:42 pm

Subject: Re: Calculus XOR Probability

  Forward
  | Print
  | View thread
  | Show original
  | Report this message
  | Find messages by this author
  

On 13 Apr 2006 13:08:06 -0700, Han.deBru...@DTO.TUDelft.NL wrote:

>David C. Ullrich wrote:

>> Huh. That may be part of the reason why your "jibes" are all
>> so silly. There are no "renormalization issues" in mathematics;
>> the problem is in the _physics_.

>No. The problem is in _mathematics_. Evidence forthcoming.

You know, this list of "evidence forthcoming" is getting
a little long... probably you'd have a lot more credibility
if you actually _found_ the evidence before claiming it
existed.

In any case, you don't seem to have noticed the
point to the original question about remormalization:
Take those infinities in _physics_ that get somehow
fixed by renormalization. When people complain about
this or that coming out to be infinite to they really
mean "finite but very large"?

(Hint: the answer is no.)

>Han de Bruijn

************************

David C. Ullrich

Forward