<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math</id>
  <title type="text">sci.math Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Mathematical discussions and pursuits.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/sci.math/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="sci.math feed"/>
  <updated>2010-03-20T20:11:36Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.nl" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>spudnik</name>
  <email>space...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-20T20:11:36Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/f3febeccd0421084/ecb9c054a795d169?show_docid=ecb9c054a795d169</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/f3febeccd0421084/ecb9c054a795d169?show_docid=ecb9c054a795d169"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Good Point by JSH</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  and of course, he is not known to have made any &lt;br&gt; other mistake. &lt;br&gt; thus: &lt;br&gt; the standard model is wrong about, What?... so, now, &lt;br&gt; you agree that There Are No Photons? &lt;br&gt; if there is no vacuum, then what is the need &lt;br&gt; for an aether -- can you justify any &lt;br&gt; of this e-palimpsest? &lt;br&gt; thus: &lt;br&gt; what in Hell is &amp;quot;relativistic temporal effect?...&amp;quot; NB:
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>BURT</name>
  <email>macromi...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-20T20:10:37Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/2b5704824a595f6b/ccecc3b6219ef90a?show_docid=ccecc3b6219ef90a</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/2b5704824a595f6b/ccecc3b6219ef90a?show_docid=ccecc3b6219ef90a"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Is photon emission instanteous?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  When light comes out of a radiating electric particle what size of &lt;br&gt; wave is it? &lt;br&gt; Does it take time to form its full wavelength across space? It is thus &lt;br&gt; a local phenomenon in its formation? &lt;br&gt; Mitch Raemsch
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>spudnik</name>
  <email>space...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-20T20:06:02Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/2b5704824a595f6b/c5ae8af2ee986323?show_docid=c5ae8af2ee986323</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/2b5704824a595f6b/c5ae8af2ee986323?show_docid=c5ae8af2ee986323"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Is photon emission instanteous?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  the standard model is wrong about, What?... so, now, &lt;br&gt; you agree that There Are No Photons? &lt;br&gt; if there is no vacuum, then what is the need &lt;br&gt; for an aether -- can you justify any &lt;br&gt; of this e-palimpsest? &lt;br&gt; thus: &lt;br&gt; what in Hell is &amp;quot;relativistic temporal effect?...&amp;quot; NB: &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;need 4 semesters college physics to &#39;get it&#39;.&amp;quot;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>fishfry</name>
  <email>blockspamfish...@your-mailbox.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-20T19:45:05Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/b5bd76e039fd21c8/f5ba5b1c82c0dfc0?show_docid=f5ba5b1c82c0dfc0</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/b5bd76e039fd21c8/f5ba5b1c82c0dfc0?show_docid=f5ba5b1c82c0dfc0"/>
  <title type="text">Re: PRIME NUMBER TABLES NEVER BEFORE SEEN IN THE HISTORY OF MATHEMATICS--INVERSE 19</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  In article &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;734a1d66-1f20-4e44-a409-ec4ee 1184...@e7g2000yqf.googlegroup s.com&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; No fair plagiarizing JSH!
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>spudnik</name>
  <email>space...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-20T19:27:57Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/faba95ec4697f5c6/3fc92aa91d638cc8?show_docid=3fc92aa91d638cc8</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/faba95ec4697f5c6/3fc92aa91d638cc8?show_docid=3fc92aa91d638cc8"/>
  <title type="text">Re: There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  you mean, just like ordinary matter (ionized hydrogen and &lt;br&gt; dihydrogen e.g., predominantly between stars and &lt;br&gt; between galaxies; much more of the latter, &lt;br&gt; which is a recent finding). &lt;br&gt; thus: &lt;br&gt; use L&#39;Hopital&#39;s calculus (by Bernoulli) to prove that &lt;br&gt; some divergent sequence has a rational limit. &lt;br&gt; thus: &lt;br&gt; I didn&#39;t quite grok the whole generating process, but
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>spudnik</name>
  <email>space...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-20T19:22:17Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/d06c577ac7c25ed9/ffe40c3f0c0616cc?show_docid=ffe40c3f0c0616cc</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/d06c577ac7c25ed9/ffe40c3f0c0616cc?show_docid=ffe40c3f0c0616cc"/>
  <title type="text">Re: JSH: Twin primes ( some remarks )</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  use L&#39;Hopital&#39;s calculus (by Bernoulli) to prove that &lt;br&gt; some divergent sequence has a rational limit. &lt;br&gt; thus: &lt;br&gt; I didn&#39;t quite grok the whole generating process, but &lt;br&gt; it needs a twee more meta-analysis! &lt;br&gt; thus: &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;120 New Glaciers Dyscovered on Continental Divide&amp;quot; (October 2001, &lt;br&gt; Sunday LATimes, near the back of the A section, just the top 1/5
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Nam Nguyen</name>
  <email>namducngu...@shaw.ca</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-20T19:13:37Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/cbb719ff5311e60f/c1aef7c47e3501da?show_docid=c1aef7c47e3501da</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/cbb719ff5311e60f/c1aef7c47e3501da?show_docid=c1aef7c47e3501da"/>
  <title type="text">Re: &#39;When Are Relations Neither True Nor False?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Why, given Ay ~(S(y) = 0) is an an axiom of Q? What do you think the &lt;br&gt; technical definition of trivial proof be? &lt;br&gt; I don&#39;t go by belief in technical argument. If you ask me a _subjective_ &lt;br&gt; opinion and I already gave one (about certain uni-directional flow of &lt;br&gt; provability) and you don&#39;t believe it, that&#39;s your problem and not
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>spudnik</name>
  <email>space...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-20T19:09:33Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/ca88ba5c37b2eb83/e6fb3e6a1a78e764?show_docid=e6fb3e6a1a78e764</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/ca88ba5c37b2eb83/e6fb3e6a1a78e764?show_docid=e6fb3e6a1a78e764"/>
  <title type="text">Re: A regularity in Collatz sequences</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I didn&#39;t quite grok the whole generating process, but &lt;br&gt; it needs a twee more meta-analysis! &lt;br&gt; thus: &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;120 New Glaciers Dyscovered on Continental Divide&amp;quot; (October 2001, &lt;br&gt; Sunday LATimes, near the back of the A section, just the top 1/5 &lt;br&gt; of the page). well, yes, to some extent, you do have &lt;br&gt; to question the authority bumperstickers; that is to say,
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Daryl McCullough</name>
  <email>stevendaryl3...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-20T18:54:38Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/cbb719ff5311e60f/410e1d069eade22a?show_docid=410e1d069eade22a</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/cbb719ff5311e60f/410e1d069eade22a?show_docid=410e1d069eade22a"/>
  <title type="text">Re: &#39;When Are Relations Neither True Nor False?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Nam Nguyen says... &lt;br&gt; Yes, it certainly is. &lt;br&gt; I don&#39;t believe you.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>jhn</name>
  <email>jhni...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-20T18:44:26Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/835e58e06fa5a97e/4fce4c7ad8ebae96?show_docid=4fce4c7ad8ebae96</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/835e58e06fa5a97e/4fce4c7ad8ebae96?show_docid=4fce4c7ad8ebae96"/>
  <title type="text">Partition of {1,2,3,...,3k} in k blocks</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Let k&amp;gt;=3 be an odd integer. It seems that there is always &lt;br&gt; a partition of {1,2,3,...,3k} in exactly k blocks such that &lt;br&gt; all blocks have the same sum of elements. For example, &lt;br&gt; for k=3: {{1,2,3,4,5}, {6,9}, {7,8}}, &lt;br&gt; for k=5: {{1,2,3,5,6,7}, {4,8,12}, {9,15}, {10,14}, {11,13}}. &lt;br&gt; Is this true in general? &lt;br&gt; Best regards,
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Mensanator</name>
  <email>mensana...@aol.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-20T18:39:34Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/ca88ba5c37b2eb83/e05510c13497dbd0?show_docid=e05510c13497dbd0</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/ca88ba5c37b2eb83/e05510c13497dbd0?show_docid=e05510c13497dbd0"/>
  <title type="text">Re: A regularity in Collatz sequences</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  But what does it mean?
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>porky_pig_jr@my-deja.com</name>
  <email>porky_pig...@my-deja.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-20T18:07:03Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/c3b19384b9dcfc79/84ca744953bc8dcd?show_docid=84ca744953bc8dcd</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/c3b19384b9dcfc79/84ca744953bc8dcd?show_docid=84ca744953bc8dcd"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Vertical Structure:</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Mar 20, 1:38 pm, &amp;quot;M. M i c h a e l M u s a t o v&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; so is yo mama
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>dvsarwate</name>
  <email>dvsarw...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-20T18:06:38Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/6993dccd7c549a3e/d82b22aaabf3d40d?show_docid=d82b22aaabf3d40d</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/6993dccd7c549a3e/d82b22aaabf3d40d?show_docid=d82b22aaabf3d40d"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Fourier transform of a Gaussian in finite fields</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Mar 20, 12:01 pm, &amp;quot;magya_bl...@yahoo.com&amp;quot; &amp;lt;magya_bl...@yahoo.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; If you know (and are willing to share with us) the &lt;br&gt; definition of a Gaussian function in a finite field, &lt;br&gt; the answer will be immediately obvious, and will &lt;br&gt; be Yes or No, though I can never remember which &lt;br&gt; it is. I don&#39;t know of any books containing this
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Inverse 19 mathematics</name>
  <email>hope9...@verizon.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-20T18:06:29Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/b5bd76e039fd21c8/99bae43dd5823bd6?show_docid=99bae43dd5823bd6</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/b5bd76e039fd21c8/99bae43dd5823bd6?show_docid=99bae43dd5823bd6"/>
  <title type="text">Re: PRIME NUMBER TABLES NEVER BEFORE SEEN IN THE HISTORY OF MATHEMATICS--INVERSE 19</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Mar 20, 1:01 pm, Inverse 19 mathematics &amp;lt;hope9...@verizon.net&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; PLEASE WE HAVE A LOT OF RESPECT FOR A LOT OF MATHEMATICIANS BUT THE &lt;br&gt; CORE OF MATHEMATICS, LIKE THE OLD COMMUNIST PARTY OF SOVIET UNION , &lt;br&gt; ARE DIE HARD, AND PUT UP A BERLIN WALL BETWEEN THEIER ENTRENCHED &lt;br&gt; THEORY AND THE FREE THINKING MATHATICIANS LIKE INVERSE 19 MATHEMATICS
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>saima81</name>
  <email>saimap...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-20T18:01:41Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/d5026a7c3f68427d/38a4bb5189f2ae1f?show_docid=38a4bb5189f2ae1f</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.nl/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/d5026a7c3f68427d/38a4bb5189f2ae1f?show_docid=38a4bb5189f2ae1f"/>
  <title type="text">&quot;JOBS IN FINLAND&quot; &quot;JOBS FINLAND&quot; &quot;FINLAND JOBS&quot; &quot;ACCOUNTS JOBS IN FINLAND&quot; &quot;FINANCE JOBS IN FINLAND&quot; &quot;AGRI JPBS IN FINLAND&quot; &quot;MEDICAL JOBS IN FINLAND&quot; ON JOBS http://jobs-in-finland.blogspot.com/</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &amp;quot;JOBS IN FINLAND&amp;quot; &amp;quot;JOBS FINLAND&amp;quot; &amp;quot;FINLAND JOBS&amp;quot; &amp;quot;ACCOUNTS JOBS IN &lt;br&gt; FINLAND&amp;quot; &amp;quot;FINANCE JOBS IN FINLAND&amp;quot; &amp;quot;AGRI JPBS IN FINLAND&amp;quot; &amp;quot;MEDICAL &lt;br&gt; JOBS IN FINLAND&amp;quot; ON JOBS &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://jobs-in-finland.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;JOBS IN FINLAND&amp;quot; &amp;quot;JOBS FINLAND&amp;quot; &amp;quot;FINLAND JOBS&amp;quot; &amp;quot;ACCOUNTS JOBS IN &lt;br&gt; FINLAND&amp;quot; &amp;quot;FINANCE JOBS IN FINLAND&amp;quot; &amp;quot;AGRI JPBS IN FINLAND&amp;quot; &amp;quot;MEDICAL
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
